public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/102772] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:39:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772

            Bug ID: 102772
           Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: *86*-pc-solaris2.11
            Target: *86*-pc-solaris2.11
             Build: *86*-pc-solaris2.11

Between 20210802 (38fb24ba4d67254cea78731fc8d961903dad9646) and 20210804
(929f2cf4105ccf12d0684c6d5838f58f0ee5e7c7),
g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C began to FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86:

FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C   -Os  execution test

Thread 2 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
0x08050d7b in main () at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C:15
15            auto a = new A(b[i].unpacked);
(gdb) where
#0  0x08050d7b in main () at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C:15

=> 0x8050d7b <main()+110>:      movaps %xmm7,(%edx)

(gdb) p/x $edx
$1 = 0x8065a98

I'm attaching the gcc 11.1.0 and master assembler output for comparison.

             reply	other threads:[~2021-10-15 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-15 11:39 ro at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-10-15 11:40 ` [Bug target/102772] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-15 11:40 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-15 11:40 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-15 12:06 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-10-15 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-15 14:29 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-10-15 20:44 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-11-16 11:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-23 12:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-17 15:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-17 15:14 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-21 11:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-21 12:01 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-21 12:03 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-21 12:03 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-21 13:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-21 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 15:12 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-22 17:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 13:56 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-23 14:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 14:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-25 12:48 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-25 12:53 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-25 12:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-25 13:00 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-25 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-25 13:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-25 13:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-25 13:22 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-25 13:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 14:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 14:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 14:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 14:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 15:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 15:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 15:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-31 13:46 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-31 13:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-31 14:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-31 14:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-31 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-31 15:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-31 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-04 11:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-11  9:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-11 14:19 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-04-11 14:19 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-04-11 15:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-12  7:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-13 14:47 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-05-06  8:31 ` [Bug target/102772] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-08 12:22 ` [Bug target/102772] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).