From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 788A6385841A; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 07:35:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 788A6385841A
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102794] [12 Regression] missing vrp in evrp
 dealing with casts and ands
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 07:35:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102794-4-w0hCCzdoKG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102794-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102794-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 07:35:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102794

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #2)
> I haven't looked at this, but there's a pending patch with more
> restrictions for loop threading in the presence of loops.  Does this help?
>=20
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/581637.html
>=20
> We really shouldn't be destroying loop info.

Yes I think it does, though I have not tried it.
There was a jump threading here:
  <bb 4> :
  if (d_10 !=3D 0)
    goto <bb 5>; [INV]
  else
    goto <bb 6>; [INV]

  <bb 5> :
  foo ();

  <bb 6> :
  a_12 =3D a_3 + 1;

  <bb 7> : ;;; loop header
  # a_3 =3D PHI <-100(2), a_12(6)>
  if (a_3 !=3D 0)
    goto <bb 3>; [INV]
  else
    goto <bb 8>; [INV]

where d_10 is defined as:
  d_10 =3D (short unsigned int) a_3;


So yes blocking jumping through the loop header would help.
It is very similar to your f3 in ssa-thread-invalid.c testcase.=