From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A45103857B8B; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 13:18:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A45103857B8B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663852730;
	bh=+3aS4ex05CeIyIawnnZp/+sn4xg/B8OHHsPN7wDwhcI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JOrSj4i9gTWjFJMxNiCWHZflkhfRY0nPHfaC3ex2UVbvPl/Gpj2mQMmJfK85uypz/
	 X2OgJr7ngd9T7Ra619c6a6sEUHo/oNerRgyZ5rroRBLg+xijNu5gsF07Qjf+jKLGhx
	 tELFtzD2dk5qLfF4e+O84t/C5kIwTIbv4PN9e1+I=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102801] Incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized
 warning/interaction for a std::optional only when a nested struct is also
 present.
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 13:18:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-102801-4-LZAgulSvzE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102801-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102801-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102801

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |12.2.1, 13.0
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The testcase no longer warns after GCC 12.2 or on GCC 13 trunk for me.  I c=
an
re-confirm diagnostics with GCC 10 and GCC 11.  I'm going to add the testca=
se
and close this bug.=