From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A6CB6384CB9D; Tue,  5 Dec 2023 08:14:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A6CB6384CB9D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701764075;
	bh=n+Un+ApULlyE75by4KjFX9DBPoOnWUwYK91L55xnHLA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qzA38rMmUr8fntwzWMm3HLkt1b58qSupXhwqvWh92VclsYjDfhBX60vCCICWyFAFh
	 fqvuHOuy5At5Bm1U2Asl2CKdI5eXlz7j9ftUS8lHZp/+YodgSP+2vlzDIssr6N2/fi
	 gbN9i+NQLavs6c+RwCSrSSGqrOpUEFPxV7rBIWrw=
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug jit/102824] building pdf/dvi documentation for libgccjit fails
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 08:14:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: jit
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102824-4-OnoiQ03U8Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102824-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102824-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102824

--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm wondering if it'd be possible to insert a line like:

\batchmode

into the tex files?=20
Ref:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/25267/what-reasons-if-any-are-there=
-for-compiling-in-interactive-mode=