From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 40DC43858D1E; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 08:34:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 40DC43858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1697790855;
	bh=2VdeQFgubNRrPT+yICRQNHeOLvdl7WfgZzqyXH/0vdw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fLgCAZC9xjaH6ypFTTeG+yCf49Ndq+Nx0Ug2ncdhohb3RA2YmrkH4BO2bDa/p5B+E
	 KQJLRzr0DJnYe+7wU2tltb2w/mHgBhOiFk44LXN49VvXTQqNtVyJfuEMpiDPYcZ3Wr
	 FfgRp17PU2BOnSAXjgesLl+FwveIkGPPUyq91nCg=
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug jit/102824] building pdf/dvi documentation for libgccjit fails
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 08:34:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: jit
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102824-4-ygMOCOMeka@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102824-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102824-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102824

--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've been testing this on the compile farm, and there seems to be a wide am=
ount
of variation between machines with regards to whether this fails or not; I
think it might have to do with different machines having different sphinx
versions... I'm wondering if the minimum sphinx version documented to work =
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html needs to be updated?

--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've been testing this on the compile farm, and there seems to be a wide am=
ount
of variation between machines with regards to whether this fails or not; I
think it might have to do with different machines having different sphinx
versions... I'm wondering if the minimum sphinx version documented to work =
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html needs to be updated?=