From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7208B3858420; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:25:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7208B3858420
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/102841] [12 regression]
 libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_data-7.c FAILs
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:25:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-102841-4-n6qLtYh0Aw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102841-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102841-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:25:38 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102841

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp |[12 regression]
                   |.oacc-c-c++-common/host_dat |libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp
                   |a-7.c FAILs                 |.oacc-c-c++-common/host_dat
                   |                            |a-7.c FAILs
             Target|i?86-pc-solaris2.11,        |*-*-solaris2.11,
                   |x86_64-pc-solaris2.11,      |i?86-apple-darwin*,
                   |i?86-apple-darwin*,         |x86_64-apple-darwin*
                   |x86_64-apple-darwin*        |

--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #1)

> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> > The libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_data-7.c has been
> > FAILing
> > on Solaris and Darwin since it was installed.
>=20
> Probably not since it was originally added in commit
> d5c23c6ceacf666f218676b648801379044e326a 'OpenACC =E2=80=93 support "if" +
> "if_present" clauses with "host_data"', but rather in my more recentish
> commit 11b8286a83289f5b54e813f14ff56d730c3f3185 "[OpenACC privatization]
> Largely extend diagnostics and corresponding testsuite coverage [PR90115]=
".=20
> (Or, if it indeed has been FAILing before, then it must be a different
> problem.)

Right, I didn't look closely enough.  In fact, the test is PASSing on the
gcc-11 branch,so this is even a regression.

Besides, it affects Solaris/SPARC and x86 alike, so is not x86-specific.

> > On Solaris, the excess errors are
>=20
> > [...]: note: variable 'iftmp.3' declared in block isn't candidate for a=
djusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable
>=20
> > while Darwin shows
>=20
> > [...]: note: variable 'D.3648' declared in block isn't candidate for ad=
justing OpenACC privatization level: not addressable
>=20
> Please do tell if there are further such "[is/isn't] candidate for adjust=
ing
> OpenACC privatization level" diagnostic mismatches (excess errors, or
> FAILs), in other testcases.  (But indeed per a quick scan of
> <gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org> posts, it's just
> 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_data-7.c', and it PASSed before my
> "diagnostics" commit.)

No, this is the only instance.=