From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D0C853857C75; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:35:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D0C853857C75 From: "herrtimson at yahoo dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/102842] [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at -O2 or greater Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:35:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: herrtimson at yahoo dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: CLOSED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:35:09 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102842 tt_1 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #11 from tt_1 --- (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #10) > > Hint: its not an option to upgrade to gcc-11.2.0, since the cross compi= le > > bootstrap is fundamentally broken by missing fenv header in the gcc-11 > > branch. Mixing up host and target compiler versions is nothing to desir= e, > > its a place where there will be dragons. >=20 > Oh, is it something we can help with? Is it a problem of the compiler? the fenv bug is not new and was reported via #100017, there is already a discussion with two possible solutions. The title is a bit misleading, I hi= t it when I bootstrap a rootfs with all libs and headers for the armv7 target.=20 it seems that the fix for my gcc-10 bug was a stray commit without any bug report, so I don't know who and where to ask for a proper backport. Gentoo's gcc maintainer trofi (Sergey Trofimov) has resigned, to my great misfortune= , so I'm kind of lost with the process. Can we at least reopen? The bug is def n= ot fixed in the gcc-10 branch.=