From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C08CA3858C3A; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:32:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C08CA3858C3A From: "herrtimson at yahoo dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/102842] [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at -O2 or greater Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:32:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: herrtimson at yahoo dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:32:27 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102842 --- Comment #7 from tt_1 --- hey, thanks for the messages. I just finished to compile firefox with patch= ed cross-gcc-10.3.0, the ice is fixed with the patch from https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=3Dgcc.git;h=3D74dc179a6da33cd00f6d4a93= fbb97dc84f610126 applied to it.=20 So can you please tell me if this has already been backported to the gcc-10 branch? I just browsed through the git dirs, and I'm not certain. Also no h= int in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92807 that its been fixed= for the gcc-10 branch.=20 Is it queued to be backported? Sorry if I'm asking dumb questions, I'm just= a regular user, not a gentoo dev.=