From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 84D793858412; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:19:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 84D793858412 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/102842] [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at -O2 or greater Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:19:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:19:01 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102842 --- Comment #8 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- (In reply to tt_1 from comment #7) > hey, thanks for the messages. I just finished to compile firefox with > patched cross-gcc-10.3.0, the ice is fixed with the patch from > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=3Dgcc.git; > h=3D74dc179a6da33cd00f6d4a93fbb97dc84f610126 applied to it.=20 Great! >=20 > So can you please tell me if this has already been backported to the gcc-= 10 > branch? No, it wasn't. > I just browsed through the git dirs, and I'm not certain. Also no > hint in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92807 that its been > fixed for the gcc-10 branch.=20 >=20 > Is it queued to be backported? Apparently, the commit does not fix a regression so the author decided not = to backport it. So I would recommend updating to GCC 11.2.0, which is the latest support release. > Sorry if I'm asking dumb questions, I'm just > a regular user, not a gentoo dev. No, your questions are very reasonable and we thank you reporting the issue= you deal with.=