public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/102848] New: missing warning for bitfield overflow in C
@ 2021-10-19 21:55 msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-19 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102848
Bug ID: 102848
Summary: missing warning for bitfield overflow in C
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
G++ warns when assigning to a bit-field a value that cannot be represented in
the object but GCC does not.
$ cat x.c && /build/gcc-master/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-master/gcc -S -Wall
-Wextra x.c
struct A
{
unsigned i, j: 3;
};
void f (struct A *p)
{
p->i = -1; // missing warning
p->j = -1; // missing warning in C, -Woverflow in C++
}
void g (struct A *p)
{
if (p->i < 0) // -Wtype-limits in both C and C++, folded to false
__builtin_abort ();
}
void h (struct A *p)
{
if (p->j < 0) // missing warning in both C and C++, folded to false
__builtin_abort ();
}
x.c: In function ‘g’:
x.c:14:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression in ‘< 0’ is always false
[-Wtype-limits]
14 | if (p->i < 0)
| ^
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-10-19 21:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-19 21:55 [Bug c/102848] New: missing warning for bitfield overflow in C msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).