public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "theodort at inf dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102895] New: [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 09:49:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102895-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102895

            Bug ID: 102895
           Summary: [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at
                    -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: theodort at inf dot ethz.ch
  Target Milestone: ---

cat test.c                                                                     
                master
static int a, b, c;
void foo(void);
int main() {
  for (a = 0; a <= 1; ++a)
    if (c <= a) {
      for (b = 0; b <= 1; ++b)
        ;
    } else
      foo();
}

11.2.0 at -O3 can eliminate the call to foo but trunk at -O3 cannot:

gcc-11 -O3 -S test.c -o /dev/stdout
...
main:
.LFB0:
        .cfi_startproc
        xorl    %eax, %eax
        .p2align 4,,10
        .p2align 3
.L2:
        movl    $2, b(%rip)
        addl    $1, %eax
        movl    %eax, a(%rip)
        cmpl    $1, %eax
        je      .L2
        xorl    %eax, %eax
        ret
        .cfi_endproc

gcc-trunk -O3 -S test.c -o /dev/stdout
...
main:
.LFB0:
        .cfi_startproc
        subq    $8, %rsp
        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
        xorl    %eax, %eax
        movl    $0, a(%rip)
        .p2align 4,,10
        .p2align 3
.L5:
        testl   %eax, %eax
        jns     .L9
        call    foo
        .p2align 4,,10
        .p2align 3
.L7:
        movl    a(%rip), %eax
        addl    $1, %eax
        movl    %eax, a(%rip)
        cmpl    $1, %eax
        jle     .L5
        xorl    %eax, %eax
        addq    $8, %rsp
        .cfi_remember_state
        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
        ret
        .p2align 4,,10
        .p2align 3
.L9:
        .cfi_restore_state
        movl    $2, b(%rip)
        jmp     .L7
        .cfi_endproc


gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211022 (experimental) (GCC)

Introduced with
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=d8e1f1d24179690fd9c0f63c27b12e030010d9ea

             reply	other threads:[~2021-10-22  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22  9:49 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch [this message]
2021-10-22 10:32 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102895] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-22 11:08 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-30 18:08 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102895-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).