From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D085C3858C27; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 06:40:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D085C3858C27 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102905] [12 regression] several vector test cases fail on power 7 after r12-4490 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 06:40:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to everconfirmed bug_status component cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 06:40:00 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102905 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot = gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Component|testsuite |tree-optimization Last reconfirmed| |2021-10-25 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- As written in the commit log the existing code behaved odd and yes, possibly powerpc is the only target with weird enough costs to trigger this. The re= v. definitely changed behavior in some way. I will see whether I can reproduce and adjust the thing according to my com= ment (where I was not sure whether it was worth the trouble - esp. without tests= uite coverage ...).=