From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C57543858400; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 18:34:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C57543858400
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/102910] cf-descriptor-5-c.c fails to build
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 18:34:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102910-4-a4An8vdPIJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102910-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102910-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 18:34:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102910

--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> -=
--
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 05:28:08AM +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>=20
> --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I think the following is better:
>=20
> #ifndef alloca
> #define alloca __builtin_alloca
> #endif
>=20
> Instead of the include of alloca.h.
>=20

I have no preference with regards to the fix.  I do
however prefer that when trivially obvious choices
are available that one is selected and committed.=