From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6620D3858D3C; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:27:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6620D3858D3C From: "Darrell.Wright at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/102916] New: cmath constexpr can lead to ODR violations/incorrect results Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:27:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Darrell.Wright at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:27:40 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102916 Bug ID: 102916 Summary: cmath constexpr can lead to ODR violations/incorrect results Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Darrell.Wright at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Because many of the cmath functions are constexpr, even in conformance mode= of the compiler, this can lead to ODR issues. It is detectable in C++20 and g= ives incorrect results. #include template consteval auto foo( ) { if constexpr (requires { []() {}.template operator()<(F(), void(), 0)>(); }) { return 0; } else {=20 return 1; } } auto a =3D foo<[]{ return std::sqrt( 4.0 ); }>( ); https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/M6zGTbTfM gcc returns 0, clang/libstdc++ and MSVC return 1. I believe that in conformance -std=3Dc++20 -pedantic mode that gcc should n= ot mark these methods as constexpr=