From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 89D793858C27; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:41:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 89D793858C27 From: "gabravier at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102927] New: Failure to optimize series of if-else to use array when possible Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:41:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gabravier at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:41:01 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102927 Bug ID: 102927 Summary: Failure to optimize series of if-else to use array when possible Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gabravier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- int foo(int i) { if (i =3D=3D 0) return 52; else if (i =3D=3D 1) return 77; else if (i =3D=3D 2) return 91; else if (i =3D=3D 3) return 10; else return 42; } int bar(int i) { switch (i) { case 0: return 52; case 1: return 77; case 2: return 91; case 3: return 10; default: return 42; } } int baz(int i) { static const int results[] =3D {52, 77, 91, 10}; if (__builtin_expect_with_probability((unsigned)i < 4, 1, 0.5)) return results[(unsigned)i]; return 42; } foo can be optimized to be equivalent to baz (like bar is). This optimizati= on is done by LLVM, but not by GCC. PS: I've observed that making the if-else chain longer triggers the optimization. Is GCC considering the if-else chain to be faster than an arr= ay access ? Because in that case, it seems like bar should be optimized to an if-else chain (perhaps along with bar).=