From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AF1113858D3C; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:49:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AF1113858D3C From: "albin at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/102942] New: Implicit copy constructor not elided Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:49:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: albin at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:49:10 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102942 Bug ID: 102942 Summary: Implicit copy constructor not elided Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: albin at yahoo dot com Target Milestone: --- This is seen on every GCC version. The copy-constructor for a class with a = data buffer only gets elided if the copy-constructor is user provided. So if I h= ave a copy-constructor that explicitly calls memcpy, the compiler will elide it when it can (and thus NOT call memcpy), but if I do not declare any such constructor, the compiler *will* call mempcy even if the call could be elid= ed. https://godbolt.org/z/5YvWTE847 #include struct StructWithImplicitCpyCtr { StructWithImplicitCpyCtr(); float data[5000]; }; struct StructWithExplicitMemCpyCpyCtr { StructWithExplicitMemCpyCpyCtr(); StructWithExplicitMemCpyCpyCtr(StructWithExplicitMemCpyCpyCtr const& ot= her) { std::memcpy(data, other.data, sizeof(data)); } float data[5000]; }; void take(StructWithImplicitCpyCtr); void take(StructWithExplicitMemCpyCpyCtr); void foobar() { // The copy constructor explicitly calls memcpy, but copy elision remov= es it take(StructWithExplicitMemCpyCpyCtr()); // Here there is no explicit copy constructor to elide, we should expec= t to see // similar code generated, instead we see a call to memcpy!!! take(StructWithImplicitCpyCtr()); }=