From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 05DCA3858411; Fri,  5 Nov 2021 11:13:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05DCA3858411
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102943] [12 Regression] Jump threader
 compile-time hog with 521.wrf_r
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 11:13:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102943-4-7KOqxtwvjG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 11:13:11 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102943

--- Comment #22 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #21)
> > For the record, I hate the SPEC build system :).
>=20
> Then you're the first one! No, just kidding, it's cumbersome, and feel fr=
ee
> to contact me with questions regarding that...

:-P

Thanks so much for your work narrowing down these bugs.  It's been a real t=
ime
saver, especially your work on PR103061 which is also a SPEC issue.  I just
reproduced it thanks to your awesome tips.=