public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102943] [12 Regression] Jump threader compile-time hog with 521.wrf_r
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 18:16:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102943-4-WLov1wVOnL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-102943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943

--- Comment #26 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #25)
> LNT sees new regresion on WRF build times (around 6%) at Nov 3
> 
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=287.548.8
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=289.270.8
> 
> The revision range is 
> g:2d01bef2f214bb80dca0e91c14e95cf4d76b0afb..
> cd389e5f9447d21084abff5d4b7db6cf1da74e57 which contains switch of vrp2 to
> ranger, so I guess it is the likely reason.

This PR is still open, at least for slowdown in the threader with LTO.  The
issue is ranger wide, so it may also cause slowdowns  on non-LTO builds for
WRF, though I haven't checked.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-07 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-26 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/102943] New: VRP " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-26 11:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102943] [12 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-26 11:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-26 11:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-26 14:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-26 14:58 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-26 15:06 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-30  6:31 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-31 20:06 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-02  7:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102943] [12 Regression] Jump " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-02  7:29 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-03 10:57 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-03 10:58 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-03 13:17 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-11-03 14:33 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2021-11-03 14:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-11-04 14:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-04 14:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-04 14:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-04 15:24 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-04 17:00   ` Jan Hubicka
2021-11-04 17:00 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2021-11-05  9:08 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-05 11:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-05 11:13 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-05 11:23 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-05 17:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-07 17:17 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-07 18:16 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-11-07 18:59   ` Jan Hubicka
2021-11-07 18:59 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2021-11-12 22:14 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14  9:58 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-26 12:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 10:55 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09 20:17 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 11:20 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2022-01-19  7:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 11:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 12:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 13:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 13:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 13:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 14:01 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-03-10 14:17 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-03-10 14:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 14:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 14:33 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-03-10 14:36 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-03-16 19:48 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-03-17 11:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-17 13:05 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-03-17 14:18 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2022-03-17 20:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 10:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102943-4-WLov1wVOnL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).