From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 674AD3857C74; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:53:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 674AD3857C74
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/102953] Improvements to CET-IBT and ENDBR generation
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:53:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102953-4-0MWWY8A5Fz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102953-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102953-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:53:27 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102953

--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Cooper from comment #8)
> Actually, there is a (possibly pre-existing) diagnostics issue:
>=20
> $ cat proto.c
> static void __attribute__((cf_check)) foo(void);
> static void __attribute__((unused)) foo(void)
> {
> }
> void (*ptr)(void) =3D foo;
>=20
> $ gcc -Wall -Os -fcf-protection=3Dbranch -mmanual-endbr
> -fcf-check-attribute=3Dno -c proto.c -o proto.o
> proto.c:2:37: error: conflicting types for 'foo'; have 'void(void)'
>     2 | static void __attribute__((unused)) foo(void)
>       |                                     ^~~
> proto.c:1:39: note: previous declaration of 'foo' with type 'void(void)'
>     1 | static void __attribute__((cf_check)) foo(void);
>       |                                       ^~~
>=20
>=20
> The diagnostic complaining that the forward declaration doesn't match the
> definition gives 'void(void)' as the type in both cases, leaving out the
> fact that they differ by cf_check-ness.

Please try the v2 patch.=