From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 134473858407; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:34:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 134473858407
From: "andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/102953] Improvements to CET-IBT and ENDBR generation
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:34:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102953-4-R4V6TSQaww@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102953-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102953-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:34:12 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102953

--- Comment #25 from Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #24)
> (In reply to Andrew Cooper from comment #23)
> > Apologies for the delay, but I do now have a working prototype of Xen w=
ith
> > CET-IBT active, using the current version of these patches.
> >=20
> > The result actually builds back to older versions of GCCs, but the lack=
 of
> > cf_check-ness typechecking makes this a fragile activity.
>=20
> Should I polish my patches and submit them now?

Sorry - I missed this request.  Yes please.  These changes have been used f=
or a
while now with no issues identified.=