From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A5B213858006; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:14:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A5B213858006 From: "andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/102967] New: -Waddress with nested structures: Incorrect "the comparison will always evaluate as 'true'" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:14:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:14:28 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102967 Bug ID: 102967 Summary: -Waddress with nested structures: Incorrect "the comparison will always evaluate as 'true'" Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, I have been compiling Xen with gcc/master, and found what appears to be a regression from GCC 11. https://godbolt.org/z/qa61fs1hK is a simplified repro. The address comparison seems to be incorrectly applied to only of the two possible options. The expression as a whole is most certainly not unconditionally true.=