From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0EEFF3857C74; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:42:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0EEFF3857C74
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/102982] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at
 -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:42:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords target_milestone everconfirmed
 cc cf_reconfirmed_on component
Message-ID: <bug-102982-4-EM2JMCwK3u@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102982-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102982-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:42:11 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102982

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
   Target Milestone|---                         |12.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-10-28
          Component|tree-optimization           |ipa

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'd say that's indeed "unfortunate".  The main missing optimization though =
is
treating

  c[0][0][0] =3D 0;

as a "store" when trying to make 'c' constant, not realizing it stores the
same value as the static initializer (after making it readonly we'd have to
elide all such stores though).  That would fix the testcase as to what
is likely the desired trigger of the foo() call removal.

Honza/Martin?=