From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 823F43858405; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:14:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 823F43858405
From: "hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/102982] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at
 -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:14:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102982-4-y8YqwEJCPf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102982-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102982-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:14:18 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102982

--- Comment #4 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102982
>=20
> Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>=20
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>            Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
>    Target Milestone|---                         |12.0
>      Ever confirmed|0                           |1
>                  CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg,
>                    |                            |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg,
>                    |                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
>    Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-10-28
>           Component|tree-optimization           |ipa
>=20
> --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I'd say that's indeed "unfortunate".  The main missing optimization thoug=
h is
> treating
>=20
>   c[0][0][0] =3D 0;
>=20
> as a "store" when trying to make 'c' constant, not realizing it stores the
> same value as the static initializer (after making it readonly we'd have =
to
> elide all such stores though).  That would fix the testcase as to what
> is likely the desired trigger of the foo() call removal.
>=20
> Honza/Martin?

That is probably not too hard to pattern match.  One needs a flag in
ipa-ref marking a fact that the store is constant 0 and at IPA time
ignore it for read/write analysis.  One catch is that once it becomes
readonly we should optimize out all stores and if we want to play well
with -disable-tree-XYZ we will want specific transform pass for that.

Also if ipa-prop was extended to handle stores/loads to static variables
as "fake arguments" of functions, perhaps we could get this more
systematic.

Honza=