From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 784AE3857352; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:14:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 784AE3857352
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666700087;
	bh=g/UQ69RnNKCipOFHFBia525gFt6hoNRJfacBR5AwSdM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IGX/rGNl5LAlTAz3yjLWKCiot3pIpsEDOwluiLfUwUZR6/TxqbCdxfhldsab75CVA
	 l8K1dqe8kzAIM1sCNIKbQJ/aIdRMB9cspFqoPomAnEGZqVLA4T05dbI/dTDK+BKhCj
	 lKxdtZLvIbTPKeXjPTJv2aUBayU68Tc52q6OQjkg=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:14:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-102989-4-KFuC0cS8Dl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102989

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The x86-64 psABI has been changed for this:
https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/8ca45392570e96920f8a15d90=
3d6122f6d263cd0
but the state of the padding bits isn't mentioned there anywhere.
Also, not sure I understand the
\texttt{_BitInt(N)} types are byte-aligned to the next greatest power-of-2 =
up
to 64 bits.
sentence because for N <=3D 64 there are different rules that apply (size a=
nd
alignment
same as smallest standard integral type that can contain them) and so IMHO =
it
should just
say that the N > 64 bit-precise types are 64-bit aligned.=