From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BA4033858410; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:10:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA4033858410
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689959454;
	bh=Q2coPEsVjokSImhc6LOJxE8GfeXOWKJWXKt7GhSk+S4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EbcE749mkJ5SxmlqkQCxere+9ejV/sq7P4EHzTkBIpqqqY+tgQ9zJ1s9xQczLPWMM
	 JIz8/4hlNKEDoasnXHcVc7/qw7ZlvTVHYKJr+k9RAmf2OM5OkXbuF2x7nI6kZ8YXO/
	 Aw/X3a0vreBK9R5uNNz1folpnZ2yB3vB9hFC4J7c=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:10:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-102989-4-TgxgZed1Gc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102989

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #55592|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #87 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 55596
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D55596&action=3Dedit
gcc14-bitint-wip.patch

large/huge _BitInt __builtin_{add,sub}_overflow mostly implemented (I've le=
ft 2
spots to finish - gcc_unreachable () - which only trigger rarely).
Though, e.g. in bitint-41.c test still
t113sub
t122mul
t125mul
t127mul
t160sub
t171mul
t174mul
t176mul
functions abort, so to be debugged next week, then ubsan, inline asm and th=
en
hopefully submit.=