From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C8A5F3858415; Tue,  2 Nov 2021 20:28:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8A5F3858415
From: "ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug d/103040] [12 Regression] gdc.dg/torture/pr101273.d FAILs
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 20:28:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: d
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103040-4-HrVLEXtHa0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 20:28:37 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103040

--- Comment #14 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
(In reply to hubicka from comment #13)
> > See above comments from Iain, even if that pre-initialization is remove=
d it is
> > still miscompiled.  And, the testcase fails not because of the padding =
bits not
> > being zero, but because the address of self stored into one of the fiel=
ds isn't
> > there or modref thinks it can't be changed or set to that.  But for
> > corresponding C++ it handles it ok.
> Perhaps TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the type which is being used to test whether
> return slot pointer may escape.

Non-POD types (all classes, and any struct with a postblit, copyctor, or dt=
or)
already have TREE_ADDRESSABLE set on the RECORD_TYPE.=