From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 937623858402; Tue,  2 Nov 2021 11:15:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 937623858402
From: "ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug d/103040] gdc.dg/torture/pr101273.d FAILs
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:15:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: d
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103040-4-gMumDmpxA1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:15:06 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103040

--- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> One quite visible change is that D has those stmts that clear the vars
> before it is constructed, so e.g. in main:
>   SR.11_24 =3D 0;
>   _12 =3D SR.11_24;
>   MEM <uint128_t> [(unsigned char * {ref-all})&nrvo] =3D _12;
>   nrvo =3D nrvo101273 (); [return slot optimization]
> instead of C++
>   nrvo =3D nrvo101273 (); [return slot optimization]

The "this" pointer in D constructors are a reference rather than a pointer,
would that be enough to throw it off?

Haven't gotten round to finishing build on
a11c53985a7080f9bf6143788ccb455dc9b0da21 just yet to see.=