From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 87B50385840B; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 17:06:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 87B50385840B
From: "aaron at aaronballman dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/103084] New: Accepts invalid using enum declaration with an
 invalid elaborated-type-specifier
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:06:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aaron at aaronballman dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-103084-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:06:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103084

            Bug ID: 103084
           Summary: Accepts invalid using enum declaration with an invalid
                    elaborated-type-specifier
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: aaron at aaronballman dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

GCC (and MSVC) currently accepts the following snippet while Clang and ICC
reject:
```
enum class Pig { Oink };
using Hog =3D Pig;
using enum Hog; // Clang & ICC rejects, GCC & MSVC accepts
```
I think Clang and ICC are correct to reject this code.
http://eel.is/c++draft/enum.udecl says that the production needs to parse an
elaborated-enum-specifier. One of the requirements for a valid
elaborated-enum-specifier is that the elaboration has to agree in kind with=
 the
given declaration (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.type.elab#6). In this case, =
the
given declaration is not an enum, it's a type alias.

Note that all compilers reject the following slightly different example due=
 to
the elaborated type specifier being invalid:
```
enum class Pig { Oink };
using Hog =3D Pig;
enum Hog H; // Everyone rejects
```=