From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A58F73858015; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:06:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A58F73858015 From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:06:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:06:29 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103088 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 18 Nov 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103088 >=20 > Aldy Hernandez changed: >=20 > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.o= rg >=20 > --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez --- > I can reproduce this with -i ref with -O3 -ffast-math but not with -O3 > -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations. >=20 > Richi the configury bits you shared once upon a time had > -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations for 500.perlbench. Are there known issues= with > this test for -ffast-math that we had -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations? Indeed - interesting. I don't remember anything and I have originally copied this config from our testers which means iff then maybe Martin knows ... ;)=