From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 193A03858023; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:49:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 193A03858023 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1675187355; bh=mDfGdurY/ljCwcOKE++Wc2uf5YrXpZSnKGF/J+Bn/C4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=v5EoI9pNBHigPmfAjfeIiAnLdDLaGpuMAr4owfbc60DGQCGNSwJp1FRrcgazAGx4a aU15fhnV6H8tucnuCC/yP2caJig6r+NwPKn72dWpyupmaZXZ26sLuVbwr19IfYEWMs fU5y98QrMYi0PK+X4OfmGm1C9AWw99XDYAfhTONU= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/103100] [11/12/13 Regression] unaligned access generated with memset or {} and -O2 -mstrict-align Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:49:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103100 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski --- Another testcase which is now affecting us at Marvell in our early firmware: ``` void f(const char*); void g(void) { char t[32] =3D "0l2345678"; f(t); } ``` So I am planning on getting back on this patch starting today.=