From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9FF313858404; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:33:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9FF313858404 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/103166] [12 regression] wrong dependency on getentropy on newlib-based targets Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:33:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:33:06 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103166 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2021-11-10 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the revision is r12-5056. So there are two issues here both dealing with getentropy; one is a newlib issue and the other is a libstdc++ issue (well maybe still a newlib one). Newlib issue: Newlib includes a version of arc4random which requires getentropy. libstdc++/Newlib issue: libstdc++ detects getentropy in the header and thinks it can work. newlib defines it unconditionally too. Maybe the better fix is to fix newlib?=