public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103192] [12 Regression] ICE on libgomp target-in-reduction-2.{C,c} Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 13:28:06 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-103192-4-JmxMzwwek7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-103192-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103192 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The guard seems to be removed by the vrp2 pass, not by jump threading. a.ii.195t.vrp2:Folding predicate iftmp.2373_1515 != 0B to 1 For some bizarre reason, ranger thinks iftmp.2373_1515 is nonzero and removes the check against zero: =========== BB 219 ============ region_type_1384(D) unsigned int VARYING ctx_1386 struct gimplify_omp_ctx * [1B, +INF] code_1387(D) tree_code [0, 65535] outer_ctx_1389 struct gimplify_omp_ctx * VARYING _2620 bool VARYING c_3771 union tree_node * [1B, +INF] _3783 bool VARYING <bb 219> [local count: 105119385]: iftmp.2340_1256 = code_1387(D) == 199 ? 81 : 80; iftmp.2304_1247 = code_1387(D) == 195 ? 81 : 80; check_non_private_1152 = code_1387(D) != 177 ? "lastprivate" : 0B; iftmp.2373_1515 = code_1387(D) != 181 ? ctx_1386 : outer_ctx_1389; iftmp.2304_1247 : gomp_map_kind [80, 81] iftmp.2340_1256 : gomp_map_kind [80, 81] iftmp.2373_1515 : struct gimplify_omp_ctx * [1B, +INF] Notice the non-zero range on exit. To reproduce: tmcc1plus a.ii -O2 -fdisable-tree-threadfull2 -fdisable-tree-threadfull1 -fdisable-tree-thread2 -fdisable-tree-thread1 -fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:543-543:544-544:550-550:551-551:552-552:553-553:554-554:555-555 -fno-PIE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-common -fdump-tree-all-lineno and search for: :10070:.*omp_add_variable ...in the vrp2 dump. There's no guard on iftmp.2373_1515 because the check was removed. It is possible that threadfull2, which uses the ranger engine and runs before vrp2, was threading the check, since ranger obviously thinks it's a constant. This is why removing threadfull2 didn't fix the problem, since vrp2 (which is now using ranger) will make the same conclusion, albeit with a different approach (remove the conditional instead of thread the path). And indeed, if I add --param=vrp2-mode=vrp, to the above steps, the problem goes away. So, this is ranger...not the threader. I'm going to put this aside while I take a look at the other P1s that are completely the threader's fault, and if Andrew doesn't get to it before, I'll come back to this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-12 13:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-11 14:39 [Bug tree-optimization/103192] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-11 15:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103192] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-11 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 7:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 8:15 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 10:28 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 11:13 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 11:22 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 11:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 11:38 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 11:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 13:28 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-11-12 13:30 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-13 18:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-13 19:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-15 20:30 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2021-11-15 22:08 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2021-11-16 3:12 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-16 8:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-16 12:17 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-16 13:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-16 13:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-17 13:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-22 17:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-29 8:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-10 8:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-11 6:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-103192-4-JmxMzwwek7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).