From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B01743858414; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:02:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B01743858414 From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103253] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in convert_mult_to_fma or in vect_recog_mask_conversion_pattern) since r12-5129-g8ed62c929c7c4462 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:02:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:02:38 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103253 --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina --- Looks like the RPO pass is causing match.pd to simply vect_iftmp.10_41 =3D vect__1.9_38 * vect_cst__40; vect_iftmp.10_42 =3D vect__1.9_39 * vect_cst__40; iftmp.0_8 =3D _1 * 2.0e+0; mask_patt_19.11_44 =3D vect_vec_iv_.8_36 !=3D vect_cst__43; mask_patt_20.12_45 =3D [vec_unpack_lo_expr] mask_patt_19.11_44; mask_patt_20.12_46 =3D [vec_unpack_hi_expr] mask_patt_19.11_44; vect_patt_21.13_48 =3D VEC_COND_EXPR ; vect_patt_21.13_49 =3D VEC_COND_EXPR ; into _54 =3D .COND_MUL (mask_patt_20.12_45, vect__1.9_38, { 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.= 0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0 }, { 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0 }); vect_patt_21.13_48 =3D _54; _55 =3D .COND_MUL (mask_patt_20.12_46, vect__1.9_39, { 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.= 0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 2.0e+0 }, { 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0 }); vect_patt_21.13_49 =3D _55; iftmp.0_3 =3D i_10 !=3D 0 ? iftmp.0_8 : 1.0e+0; which is perfectly valid and much simpler, so need to see why DCE6 mangles this.=