From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B6835385841A; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 04:53:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B6835385841A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1697432015; bh=ECEbrLbDYIAweiFdux/6h+JLq2/jq7JcS2J3xDsQuF0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BfMMdM+lR1k6i4hViXpAJ+eXXfOZ1l7SGxB+6Gj5hfLT6QYNPtHcYaYrVjZRkEqy9 0pIT9L/6GvD5ykpwTqSeTjIlwzG1w6vmOGyb0Wx4hRADLnwLPfzO8N1sv+Dkpk6pBB wyC2uaRpVoCX5bklXImhWvqIeBMEVG77p9MxYjsQ= From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/103324] RFE: Add a `make quickcheck` or `make smoketest` Makefile target to allow only running a portion of the testsuite Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 04:53:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103324 --- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > Thus, > >=20 > > make check RUNTESTFLAGS=3D"execute.exp" > > make check RUNTESTFLAGS=3D"dg-torture.exp" >=20 >=20 > Just confirming that the proper way to combine these would be: > make check RUNTESTFLAGS=3D"execute.exp dg-torture.exp" > ...correct? > (The docs said something about being whitespace-delimited, but I wasn't > quite sure if that just applied to the globbing part, or also to the .exp > filenames...) (ok, from testing, it appears that that's correct...)=