From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 435543858CDB; Wed,  3 Apr 2024 00:49:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 435543858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712105385;
	bh=7wFFIf5G5MixD4gw6Lzd7/D7f2vMd2kz8YplgxpfcHE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QZjEOFaLRywvUKG/wPXER58cE1WHg5U2vDRSqEc+pUbgQCbwOjBl616pxOFoF3s2F
	 Bwvejxwzz+WQe870a7vwbykW+DrFnBdm69FLtyOk/ioAyVi6lCUrC0YaC0ltM4AkFz
	 9JFdHopSb7guYetMw0S6yF9oRqh/ywbaXww2+yEs=
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/103368] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at
 gimplify.c:15668 since r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:49:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-103368-4-BvKbxutRkV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103368

Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> Seems to ICE no longer at r14-9759, but 13-branch and older still fail.
> Adjusting summary.
>=20
> But is it really invalid code?  Intel and NAG accept it.

I am not getting an ICE here. Until sub is defined or further definitions on
components to t or t2, I do not see a basis to reject anything or give a
diagnostic.=