From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A4D153858425; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:40:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A4D153858425 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712086823; bh=Ozx6tvMh5/TcVsX9ME0f7By4Gftxc6qAG7QLKH3bQpI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SQMTi9KpA1OVKmD6e4EPBRoIKhpvT/QSxalgppOOh4ysBXauXjUoDReWTvbFW+RYS OuyHqX3Cxs6LZxzs6tTexGVzWHE6laDlrXBEU0up0xs0y6HOx8ktg17Wijj+D/W9AK AHuRGHOoKjN9pxwEiq/GADYRsvlQCMFC2dFfleUQ= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/103368] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15668 since r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:40:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103368 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to work| |14.0 Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression] |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |ICE in gimplify_expr, at |in gimplify_expr, at |gimplify.c:15668 since |gimplify.c:15668 since |r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47 |r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Seems to ICE no longer at r14-9759, but 13-branch and older still fail. Adjusting summary. But is it really invalid code? Intel and NAG accept it.=