public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "theodort at inf dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103388] New: [12 Regression] missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (vs. -O2) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:21:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-103388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103388 Bug ID: 103388 Summary: [12 Regression] missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (vs. -O2) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: theodort at inf dot ethz.ch Target Milestone: --- cat case.c void foo(void); void bar(void); static int b, d, e, *c, *f = &d, *h = &b; int main() { int **i = &c; if (e) { e = *f; bar(); if (!(((i && d) + *h >= 1 ^ d & b) <= 4 | d)) foo(); } } trunk cannot eliminate the call to foo but 11.2.0 can: gcc-11.2.0 -O3 -S -o /dev/stdout case.c main: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc movl e(%rip), %ecx testl %ecx, %ecx jne .L8 xorl %eax, %eax ret .L8: pushq %rax .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16 movl d(%rip), %eax movl %eax, e(%rip) call bar xorl %eax, %eax popq %rdx .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 ret .cfi_endproc .LFE0: gcc-trunk -O3 -S -o /dev/stdout case.c main: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc movl e(%rip), %esi testl %esi, %esi jne .L10 xorl %eax, %eax ret .L10: pushq %rcx .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16 movl d(%rip), %eax movl %eax, e(%rip) call bar movl d(%rip), %edx movl b(%rip), %eax cmpl $1, %edx movl %eax, %ecx sbbl $-1, %ecx testl %ecx, %ecx setg %cl andl %edx, %eax movzbl %cl, %ecx xorl %ecx, %eax cmpl $4, %eax setle %al movzbl %al, %eax orl %edx, %eax je .L11 .L3: xorl %eax, %eax popq %rdx .cfi_remember_state .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 ret .L11: .cfi_restore_state call foo jmp .L3 .cfi_endproc .LFE0: gcc-trunk -v Using built-in specs. Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20211123 (experimental) (GCC) Started with https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=4b3a325f07acebf47e82de227ce1d5ba62f5bcae
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 18:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-23 18:21 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch [this message] 2021-11-23 19:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103388] " aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-23 19:31 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-23 23:18 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-24 8:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103388] [12 Regression] missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0) rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-18 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-18 15:28 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-06 8:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103388] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-26 13:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-08 12:23 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103388] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-04 18:23 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103388] [12/13/14/15 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-04 18:34 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-103388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).