public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gscfq@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/103390] New: [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:57:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103390-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
Bug ID: 103390
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gscfq@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Changed between 20211017 and 20211024 :
(ok without bind(c))
$ cat z1.f90
program p
integer, pointer :: z(:)
integer, target :: x(3) = [1, 2, 3]
z => x
call s(shape(z))
contains
subroutine s(x) bind(c)
integer, contiguous :: x(:)
end
end
$ gfortran-12-20211017 -c z1.f90
$
$ gfortran-12-20211121 -c z1.f90
gimplification failed:
(integer(kind=4)) _33 <nop_expr 0x7f16948401a0
type <integer_type 0x7f169465a5e8 integer(kind=4) sizes-gimplified public
SI
size <integer_cst 0x7f1694643e40 constant 32>
unit-size <integer_cst 0x7f1694643e58 constant 4>
align:32 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set 3 canonical-type
0x7f169465a5e8 precision:32 min <integer_cst 0x7f1694643df8 -2147483648> max
<integer_cst 0x7f1694643e10 2147483647>
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7f1694662a80>>
arg:0 <ssa_name 0x7f169444c1b0
type <integer_type 0x7f169483ce70 public unsigned SI size <integer_cst
0x7f1694643e40 32> unit-size <integer_cst 0x7f1694643e58 4>
align:32 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x7f169483ce70 precision:32 min <integer_cst 0x7f1694828bd0 0> max <integer_cst
0x7f1694828558 4294967295>>
def_stmt _33 = _32 + 1;
version:33>
z1.f90:5:19 start: z1.f90:5:19 finish: z1.f90:5:19>
z1.f90:5:19:
5 | call s(shape(z))
| ^
internal compiler error: gimplification failed
0xbdad08 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:15679
0xbe91bb gimplify_modify_expr
../../gcc/gimplify.c:5973
0xbd9aa7 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:14666
0xbddd78 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:7024
0xbd93db gimplify_statement_list
../../gcc/gimplify.c:2012
0xbd93db gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:15111
0xbddd78 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:7024
0xbd974c gimplify_and_add(tree_node*, gimple**)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:494
0xbd974c gimplify_loop_expr
../../gcc/gimplify.c:1986
0xbd974c gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:14871
0xbddd78 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:7024
0xbd93db gimplify_statement_list
../../gcc/gimplify.c:2012
0xbd93db gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:15111
0xbddd78 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:7024
0xbde713 gimplify_bind_expr
../../gcc/gimplify.c:1426
0xbda08a gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:14867
0xbddd78 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:7024
0xbe4780 gimplify_cond_expr
../../gcc/gimplify.c:4393
0xbda65f gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:14623
0xbddd78 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../gcc/gimplify.c:7024
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 18:57 gscfq@t-online.de [this message]
2021-11-24 8:38 ` [Bug fortran/103390] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed since r12-4591-g1af78e731feb9327 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-24 8:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 1:44 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 1:47 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-30 19:30 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-01 23:10 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-02 18:37 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 11:58 ` antony at cosmologist dot info
2022-01-03 16:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 17:01 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 18:43 ` antony at cosmologist dot info
2022-01-05 17:05 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-103390-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).