From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 518E7385840B; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 02:00:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 518E7385840B From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103399] [12 Regression] Wrong code with -O2 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 02:00:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 02:00:05 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103399 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2021-11-24 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed reduced testcase: int t1 =3D -2; int e(int) __attribute__((noipa)); int e(int f) { int t =3D 0; for (int d =3D 0; d < f; d ++) { for (int c =3D 0; c < ((f ? t1 : 0) ^ t1) + 1; c++) t=3D 42; } return t; } int main() { unsigned a =3D e(1); printf("%u\n", a); if (a !=3D 42) __builtin_abort (); } Note the t1 being negative is important. t1 being global is also important,= if you do a load of t1 before either loop, you end up with working code. THis is another bswap issue ...=