public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103409] [12 Regression] 18% SPEC2017 WRF compile-time regression with -O2 -flto since r12-5228-gb7a23949b0dcc4205fcc2be6b84b91441faa384d
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 11:25:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103409-4-kqIxSW7hcY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103409-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103409
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to hubicka from comment #13)
> > I've fixed the threading slowdown. Can someone verify and close this PR if all
> > the slowdown has been accounted for? If not, then someone needs to explore any
> > slowdown unrelated to the threader.
> The plots linked from the PR are live, so they should come back to
> original speed (so far they did not).
>
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=226.548.8
> and
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=287.548.8
There's now a big drop for the first graph, and a small drop for the second
one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 16:35 [Bug tree-optimization/103409] New: 18% WRF compile-time regression with -O2 -flto between g:1ae8edf5f73ca5c3 and g:1ae8edf5f73ca5c3 hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-25 1:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103409] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-25 1:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103409] 18% WRF compile-time regression with -O2 -flto between g:264f061997c0a534 and g:3e09331f6aeaf595 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-25 8:32 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103409] [12 Regression] " hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2021-11-25 8:58 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-25 9:47 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103409] [12 Regression] 18% SPEC2017 " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-25 15:00 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-25 18:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103409] [12 Regression] 18% SPEC2017 WRF compile-time regression with -O2 -flto since r12-3903-g0288527f47cec669 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-25 22:25 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2021-11-26 12:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103409] [12 Regression] 18% SPEC2017 WRF compile-time regression with -O2 -flto since r12-5228-gb7a23949b0dcc4205fcc2be6b84b91441faa384d marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-26 12:34 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-29 14:22 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-29 14:36 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-01 16:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-01 16:14 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-01 20:49 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2021-12-03 11:25 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-12-03 11:28 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-103409-4-kqIxSW7hcY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).