From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 612F4385800A; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 21:02:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 612F4385800A
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer,
 intent(in) array argument
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 21:02:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103418-4-heyjwcGogG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103418-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103418-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 21:02:34 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103418

--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> > The nearly obvious fix:
> >=20
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c
> > index 837eb0912c0..3859e18c6c3 100644
> > --- a/gcc/fortran/check.c
> > +++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c
> > @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ variable_check (gfc_expr *e, int n, bool allow_pr=
oc)
> >             break;
> >         }
> >=20=20
> > -      if (!ref)
> > +      if (!ref && !pointer)
> >         {
> >           gfc_error ("%qs argument of %qs intrinsic at %L cannot be "
> >                      "INTENT(IN)", gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[n]->name,
> >=20
> > regresses for gfortran.dg/move_alloc_8.f90, thus needs additional
> > investigation.
>=20
> Did you try the patch posted in Fortran Discourse?

No.

I'm afraid I also missed it on the usual channels where patches for gcc
are posted.=