From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D04363858413; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:27:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D04363858413 From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/103418] random_number() does not accept pointer, intent(in) array argument Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:27:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:27:23 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103418 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > The nearly obvious fix: >=20 > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c > index 837eb0912c0..3859e18c6c3 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/check.c > +++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c > @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ variable_check (gfc_expr *e, int n, bool allow_proc) > break; > } >=20=20 > - if (!ref) > + if (!ref && !pointer) > { > gfc_error ("%qs argument of %qs intrinsic at %L cannot be " > "INTENT(IN)", gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[n]->name, >=20 > regresses for gfortran.dg/move_alloc_8.f90, thus needs additional > investigation. Did you try the patch posted in Fortran Discourse?=