From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 43426386F44A; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:02:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 43426386F44A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1713506558; bh=uEGI0l8uiOui8zcfQ89Tt0xSnzR2ki2MNiwaV28gzCM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=enzuW3hp/4fSn98r0mItc0P3g8BArGiBv5HJJQdGaMt3srvKhCsNxQR31vLXWEK1j Bfk6Ejb349dWLsjGLW9SdEwyWrJcxKuEZZ1fkntWmOIp1yTY1ypuKe2mo4o2edJGHI g/e9AsJjRixm3MxRQ3DOpaiX+W0cwcPPAi/JbwOI= From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/103471] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:02:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103471 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- > This looks more user friendly. Also true. I have put it on to regtest but I think that it might be a good = idea to understand how the symbol evades resolution :-) Paul=