From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C8FDA386EC12; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 21:02:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8FDA386EC12 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1666299727; bh=WwUI1GjJWBFMEPl9YshNj1zHEn4WvsLtQ4pqyoyUqlY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s2PDS2v5gX6uqnvgvC3kDcvrC3Ra1SvikbCKmPjr8S4BuEbZjzDHZ/BDClOVlvsNh Jk67PgHQ5A90WQoOeeO3xZRBnIR821aJWU9ML2JT44jqsa+5GxA94Mty6CMLAL8cjT uhAgNr5wf8l0bFev+CJTV1UExJlrMpIeqp/NxAkA= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/103474] ICE in simplify_cobound, at fortran/simplify.c:4415 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 21:01:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103474 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch in comment#1 fixes comment#0, but not comment#2, which hits anoth= er assert. That one needs additionally something like @@ -4353,7 +4356,8 @@ simplify_cobound (gfc_expr *array, gfc_expr *dim, gfc_expr *kind, int upper) case AR_ELEMENT: if (ref->u.ar.as->corank > 0) { - gcc_assert (as =3D=3D ref->u.ar.as); +// gcc_assert (as =3D=3D ref->u.ar.as); + as =3D ref->u.ar.as; goto done; } as =3D NULL; However, that would lead to silent acceptance of invalid code which needs checking elsewhere.=