From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id D5EAE3858409; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:20:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D5EAE3858409
From: "fchelnokov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/103478] New: Possible regression in constexpr processing
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:20:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fchelnokov at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-103478-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:20:43 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103478

            Bug ID: 103478
           Summary: Possible regression in constexpr processing
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: fchelnokov at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

The following code is accepted by GCC 9.4 and rejected by GCC 10.1:
```
#include <array>
using namespace std;

template<size_t N> using string_literal_t =3D char[N];

template<class T> struct StrSize; ///< metafunction to get the size of stri=
ng
literal alikes=20

/// specialize StrSize for string literals
template<size_t N>
struct StrSize <string_literal_t<N>>{ static constexpr size_t value =3D N-1=
; };

/// template variable, just for convenience
template <class T>
constexpr size_t str_size =3D StrSize<T>::value;

/// now do the same but with constexpr function
template<class T>
constexpr auto strsize(const T&) noexcept-> decltype(str_size<T>) {
   return str_size<T>;
}

template<class S, size_t... Is>
constexpr auto test_helper(const S& s, index_sequence<Is...>) noexcept->
array<char, str_size<S>> {
   return {s[Is]...};
}

template<class S>
constexpr auto test(const S& s) noexcept-> decltype(auto) {
   return test_helper(s, make_index_sequence<strsize(s)>{});
}

auto main()-> int {
   static_assert(strsize("qwe") =3D=3D 3, "");
   static_assert(noexcept(test("qwe")) =3D=3D true, "");

   return 0;
}
```
Demo: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/43TcY485x

Could you please check whether it is a regression?

Related discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/q/43072361/7325599=