public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 @ 2021-11-29 21:11 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 6:13 ` [Bug middle-end/103479] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 more replies) 0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-29 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 Bug ID: 103479 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:0888d6bbe97e10de0e624f4ab46acc276e5ee1d7, r12-5489 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c scan-tree-dump-times dce7 "= 0" 1 # of expected passes 2 # of unexpected failures 1 spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ exceptions_enabled2369981.cc -fdiagnostics-plain-output -S -o exceptions_enabled2369981.s PASS: gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c (test for excess errors) Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to ... Execution timeout is: 300 spawn [open ...] PASS: gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c execution test gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c: pattern found 2 times FAIL: gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c scan-tree-dump-times dce7 "= 0" 1 commit 0888d6bbe97e10de0e624f4ab46acc276e5ee1d7 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) Author: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com> Date: Wed Nov 24 06:38:18 2021 +0000 middle-end: Convert bitclear <imm> + cmp<cc> #0 into cm<cc2> <imm2> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 6:13 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 7:06 ` [Bug testsuite/103479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 --- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Could you post the dce7 dump file if you have it? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 6:13 ` [Bug middle-end/103479] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 7:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 13:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|middle-end |testsuite Target Milestone|--- |12.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 6:13 ` [Bug middle-end/103479] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 7:06 ` [Bug testsuite/103479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 13:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 13:42 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 51907 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51907&action=edit dec7 dump file Dump file attached ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2021-11-30 13:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 13:42 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-02 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-02 13:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to seurer from comment #2) > Created attachment 51907 [details] > dec7 dump file > > Dump file attached Got it, thanks, I'll fix it today, the regexp is too liberal in this case. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2021-11-30 13:42 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-02 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-02 13:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-02 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina <tnfchris@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d6c20c06ce4e5d595245af503b045c2032c02f7 commit r12-5713-g7d6c20c06ce4e5d595245af503b045c2032c02f7 Author: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com> Date: Thu Dec 2 13:30:08 2021 +0000 testsuite: make bic-bitmask-18.c test more precise [PR103479] This updates the testcase bic-bitmask-18.c to seach for " = 0;" as an expression so it doesn't match any other partial expressions. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR testsuite/103479 * gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c: Update regexpr to expect = 0;. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2021-12-02 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-02 13:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-02 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Should be fixed now. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-02 13:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 6:13 ` [Bug middle-end/103479] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 7:06 ` [Bug testsuite/103479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 13:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-30 13:42 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-02 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-02 13:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).