From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5C15F385C406; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:22:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5C15F385C406 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103491] nextafter does not raise "overflow" and "inexact" floating-point exceptions Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:22:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on component bug_status cc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:22:36 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103491 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2021-11-30 Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org, | |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed with -frounding-math and optimization where we simply elide the nextafter call (and its side-effects). I think the idea is that -ftrapping-math should preserve such calls (but that's default on even). -frounding-math is documented to be required for FENV_ACCESS. Also confirmed as a glibc bug in 2.31 with -O0 where we call nextafter (). The manpage isn't too informative on whether your expectation is valid.=