From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B58323858C78; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:59:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B58323858C78
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712912368;
	bh=zuDI+R3gh2RWf0eOjuPDQ7dVxYI39M4tZbDWessjDmc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZSYhyMSyEJJqAHPP3qj1lI4dcBZjgrTG7ePjwRp+umT3nJG8cXjVHr+EVB6DksMKY
	 mOs7RQuuGaTB44oCXWd/epmiSbCr0kvLar2HAcn9kW55WBpGn3jXEwWgq0o8LHB+it
	 l+WWuDmAo290EQva/lMgY05BIdSmeRKWtZRLOtCY=
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBmb3J0cmFuLzEwMzQ5Nl0gW0YyMDE4XVtUUzI5MTEzXSBD?=
 =?UTF-8?B?X1NJWkVPRiDigJMgcmVqZWN0cyBub3cgdmFsaWQgYXJncyB3aXRoICdtdXN0?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IGJlIGFuIGludGVyb3BlcmFibGUgZGF0YSBlbnRpdHkn?=
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:59:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103496-4-G1qVZ0J0ip@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103496

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The code in comment#0 compiles at r14-9893-gded646c91d2c0f
> and gives the indicated results.

which is the commit:
 Fortran: fix argument checking of intrinsics C_SIZEOF, C_F_POINTER [PR1065=
00]

It looks as if the issue is fixed, but gfortran misses a tescast to check t=
hat
the obtained value is correct.

c_sizeof_7.f90 contains tests, but I think there should be a run time trst =
that
the obtained values are correct; I think some are constants such that  a
tree-dump scan test would work as well, but for the dynamic ones, a run time
test seems zo be easier than trying to capture the generated code...=