From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C5CCB3858414; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:29:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C5CCB3858414 From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/103505] ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, at fortran/resolve.c:4587 since r8-7594-g078c5aff5ed83e9c Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 22:29:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 22:29:20 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103505 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl -= -- On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:42:44PM +0000, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103505 >=20 > --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5) > > Ah yes. Good catch. Are you going to insert the 2 lines=20 > > lower int the file? If so, I think you can considered=20 > > the patch complete and reviewed. >=20 > Unfortunately this regresses on gfortran.dg/arith_divide_2.f90, > another testcase submitted by Gerhard. We lose the information > on division by zero... >=20 Bummer. Is the regression an ICE or a segfault on execution. The former is unacceptable. The latter is user error and the testcase can be removed.=