From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5ABA43858D28; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:06:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5ABA43858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1674785173; bh=pqFwuyMAzbkq072uA35HnO0ZXc72lRxkVB/f83GJ3sA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WrawST5fHeK6oRIwSCAZ8W/w0eExrSyAy0qMZY/ZKi5T346xUFrry1FyHDB1UsYZx QMSpzySRLq4Sto4WFqSU6qm5FyPwbDUY0lq1qRY87wlaHcsq7j6A5R4yMRgoBVi/Le ET5XgfIUgiQQbNDGgsQawCLLsoBHzcxVxaySerFc= From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/103506] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:4039 since r10-2798-ge68a35ae4a65d2b3 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:06:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103506 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- The only other way would be some sort of built in memory management scheme = that would guarantee all "objects" are freed implicitly. Of course gfortran its= elf implements this type of thing as does I think C++ and Rust. Well we sure are not going to completely rewrite gfortran. Sometimes I thi= nk we just ought to accept ice-on-invalid and just toss out all those bug repo= rts as the effort to fix them is not worth the benefit from doing so. I would like to see if we can get a list out of Bugzilla for at least the o= nes we have marked as ice-on-invalid and just push those priorities to the back= of the line.=